Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Homeless Bedford Reader

Joseph Papalexandrou The essay I am analyzing is unsettled written by Anna Quindlen. The essay can be found in The Bedford Reader 10th edition. My curiosity it what brought me to this essay. The topic I am writing about is radicalless citizens. What interests me about homeless masses is that it never teachms to bother them where on that point living. What also gave me interest is how do homeless plenty sustenance themselves with no funds?I eternally marvel why homeless people dont look for money on the streets and save what they find buys a pair of clothes and go for a job interview at McDonalds. The overall message in this essay is that people make what they countenance home. If its living in a box or on the street they will always call that place home. It doesnt matter what you have but how you get about what you have. If youre ok with where you call home then that fine. The substantive message in this essay is that not all people depend on items or things they have t o make them happy.The overall tone in this essay is subjective and personal. Anna is trying to do a story on homeless people, and she found women called Ann on the hazard of a bus. Quindlen tries to get whatsoever information out of the women at the back of the bus and she is having a dense time doing so. In the story Quindlen goes back and forth with how she doesnt see the big picture in things. But she does bring up approximately personal information. There ar no images in this essay although in that location the Quindlen likes to make a lot of understatements.She says that its not where you live or how big it is but that its the place you call home. So fundamentally living in a box you can call home and it doesnt matter because its your home. That is a very big understatement. A lot of people like stability to be able to feed themselves everyday and be clean. The details and evidence that I found to obligate the main message in this story was when quindlen wrote They are n ot the homeless.They are people with no home. (Quindlen 200) That pretty much gives me the feeling that she is saying that there is no right to look down on somebody because they have no home and that it gives us no right to call someone homeless. In this essay there are logos & pathos. In the essay Quindlen started to do to a report on homeless people and she even mentioned that she never seen the big picture up until she met Ann on the back of the bus. Quindlen started to no longer call homeless people homeless she instead refers them to people without a home.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.