Week 3 Conference Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Week 3 Conference - Essay Examplerovide constitutional compensate fully because they do not provide tor the even off of the due process of law that has been accorded to all accused persons in the United States. In that, any bear witness or testimony from previous trials can be admissible during the trial, which I not the parapraxis in the criminal civil courts that means that the tried person is not accorded the right to due process. The courts should allow a structure as that of the civilian court to ensure that all the constitutional rights are upheld.In the case of Exparte Milligan (1866), the court illustrated that the constitution protects the law of the land. It also tried to justify the fact that every person should pull back a fair trial. Upon Appeal it was held that Milligan should have been tried in a regular court and not a military tribunal as the law protects every person and they are equal.Korematsu had a right of fair treatment as any other American resident but s ince he was Japanese, the giving medication felt that they had a right to protect their inelegant during war times. Moreover, if they saw him as a menace then they had a right to send him away from his home where he had refused to come out of, as he believed it was his right. The court felt that it was impossible from them to separate the friend from the foe or the royal and the unpatriotic as Korematsu was from the imperial Japan as all the Japanese were supposed to go to the internment tent and there would be no exceptions (Konkoly,2006, par.3). The court was correct in its holding not to exclude Korematsu from locomote from his house to the internment camp as the rest of the Japanese, as they were protecting the security of the whole nation.The ejection order 9066 at that time that is the 1942 to 1944 was seen as constitution because the courts sided with the government as they were trying to protect the country during the time of war. It was also held that the individual r ight of Mr. Fred was not as important as the rights of the American hatful and